When is a fact not a fact? Don’t ask the US Regulator!

When Is A Fact Not A Fact

In November 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to support rules that would limit investors’ ability to ask executives at companies the investors own to describe how they are addressing unambiguous facts like climate change in their corporate strategy.

The SEC has proposed to increase the minimum investment threshold investors must achieve before they can engage companies they own and ask how their corporate strategies address business risks related to environmental change.

Together with the SEC’s proposed limits on proxy voting, these rule changes undermine investors’ ability to address well-known facts like climate change and lesser known facts such as collapsing fisheries, deforestation, disease, drought and fire.

In the meantime, the trees of the Amazon and the Congo Basin burn and the seas are under threat because they absorb 93% of the excess heat from climate change. And in 2016 and 2017, climate change caused the ocean temperature to increase so much that overheated seas destroyed 50% of the Great Barrier Reef.

This is why U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres stated at COP25 – the annual climate change conference – “We are knowingly destroying the very support systems keeping us alive”.

Why does this matter? The rule changes proposed by the SEC matter to investors globally as every company on earth needs healthy seas and trees. If you use paper and drink water in your office, you are relying upon natural resources.

And as the largest capital market in the world, investors globally invest in the U.S.

So, while one arm of the U.S. Government is making it more difficult for investors globally to ask questions of U.S. companies they own regarding facts, another arm of the U.S. Government published a damning report about facts on the current Arctic collapse and its economic impacts.

The results from the annual U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Arctic are bad – very, very bad.

And to make matters worse, what happens in the Arctic does not stay in the Arctic.

The Arctic can hurt your portfolio.

Now some facts:

  • Greenland is losing ice seven times faster than 20 years ago.
  • Disappearing ice in the Bering Sea, one of the largest U.S. commercial fisheries, presents unknown risks to this regional economic engine. Just in 2017, the Bering sea crab fisheries collapse caused an $184 million decrease in revenues while landings decreased 46%.
  • Thawing permafrost throughout the Arctic could be releasing 300 million to 600 million tons of net carbon per year to the atmosphere.
  • August mean sea surface temperatures in 2019 were 1°C to 7°C warmer than the 1982-2010 August mean in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, the Laptev Sea and Baffin Bay.

The Arctic matters to your investments and to you because the Arctic is your air conditioner. The Arctic cools your living room in the summer, so when the Arctic gets hot, you get hotter.

And when it gets hotter, investors have a right to discuss facts with the companies they own about how these companies are going to protect the Arctic and keep the air conditioning on.

Fortunately, for those who appreciate standing up tall and proud, the SEC has not yet also challenged other facts, such as whether forests have trees or water is wet.

Related Posts

Investors need to ensure that risks associated with plastic are adequately priced

Analysis of equity risk premia of 150 top corporates in the plastic value chain finds risk perception in industry is at its lowest level since 2011, despite a potential‘landslide of regulation’ including Global Plastic Pollution Treaty. Investors failing to forecast changes in risk profile means corporate liabilities and litigation costs in plastics could rise above USD 20 billion by end of the decade for the US alone, possibly USD 100 billion annually and beyond by 2030.

About Us

Planet Tracker is a non-profit financial think tank aligning capital markets with planetary boundaries. It was created in 2018 to investigate the risk of market failure related to environmental limits, focusing on oceans, food & land use and materials such as textiles and plastics.

Let’s Socialize

Popular Post